A Job Well Done!

One in a Series of Updates on the 20th Year of the Delaware Bay Shorebird Project

by Dr. Larry Niles, LJ Niles Associates LLC

On our final effort to trap shorebirds on Delaware Bay, we had the remarkable opportunity to watch sanderling and ruddy turnstones lift off for the Arctic. We first saw them feeding on the wave-tossed shoreline within the protected area in Villas; 1500 birds weaving as a single thread 5 deep with the contours of the wave, acting like a flying flock on the ground. Then a disturbance, a crow flying low down the shoreline and 2000 birds fill the sky.  Most settled again but one group of about 300 flew more with greater determination than the rest. Still low but gaining altitude the flock wavered, and a mutinous band peeled away deciding against the departure returned to the safety and abundant crab eggs on the shore just north of us.  The other 150 grew more determined, more structured and rose slowly as they powered their way north. Then they disappeared into the Northern sky.

shorebirds flying for the Arctic
A flock of shorebirds seen from Reeds Beach venture into the northern horizon for a nonstop flight to the Canadian Arctic.

 

Shorebirds departing Delaware Bay for their Arctic home, 2500 miles away stand as one of the most awe-inspiring and rewarding parts of our stopover project. They usually start in the early evening under a blue sky drenched with the glow of the setting sun and continue until near dark.  They almost always go with a favorable southerly breeze and at least a clear sky in the north.  Thousands of all the species after getting fat on the Bay’s bounty of horseshoe crab eggs – red knots, ruddy turnstones, sanderling, semipalmated sandpipers, short-billed dowitchers and dunlin –  lift slowly as they fly along the Cape May peninsula coast towards Dennisville and beyond.

Viable Migration Departures_2016
Led by Clive Minton, the team counts the number of flocks and flock size from our porch on Reeds Beach. This is only an index, as birds leave after daylight and from other places in the bay.

 

They are dangerously overloaded with fat. Two birds highlighted the importance of this.  On May 30 we caught 97 knots, 168 sanderlings and 75 ruddy turnstones.  Among each species were individuals of extraordinary weight.  One bird weighed 242 grams, fully 120 grams higher than the fat free weight!  They cart this load, like a plane with extra gas tanks, to fly two days to the Arctic islands of Canada.   Imagine for a moment – you weigh 150 pounds and gain an extra hundred and fifty, then try to go anywhere, especially for 2000 miles.

 

In this video one can see all the different body shapes – and weights – of red knots and other species on Cooks Beach shoal.   It’s easy to see many birds are ready to leave.

 

The fact that they can do this is a marvel of flight bio-engineering.  While building weight they prepare like weight lifters, increasing muscle mass, heart size, and lung capacity.  Close to leaving, they decrease the organs of digestion just to squeeze in the last few grams of fat.  Then they wait for good weather, lumber into the sky and go forth into the vast north.

 

2016 was a good year for the shorebirds stopping over on the New Jersey coast. Most came in better-than-average condition, so they had a head start.  The early spawn was strangled by cold water which seemed to hover around the temperature threshold for spawning- 59 degrees F.  Tellingly however, the crabs spawned with gusto on the beaches from northern Reeds to Pierce’s Point. There the five inter-tidal creeks and inter-tidal flats warm the water that washes over spawn-inviting shoals and newly restored beaches.  Throughout the stopover a majority of the bay’s population foraged on the eggs laid by vigorously spawning horseshoe crabs.  On one day we saw a 10,000 red knot flocks on North Reeds Beach happily roosting and feeding on the abundant eggs.

 

red knots on north reeds
In this iPhone panorama of north reeds beach one could see over 8000 red knots feeding on abundant crab eggs.
crabs spawning on Villas
Spawning crabs on Villas beach

 

Eventually the spawn accelerated and expanded but the birds still needed to get to the eggs.  If constantly disturbed by people, they will move endlessly often to lesser habitat if only to avoid disturbance.  In New Jersey we prevent this. Each year for the last 15 years, the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife in collaboration with Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey, close the beaches important to crabs while leaving small observation areas open to the public.  The impact is non-intuitive but positive.

Jim May stewarding kimbles beach
Neil Olafsson saving a crab stucked on a derelict bulkhead
Jim May (first photo) and Niel Olafson (second photo) have been stewarding beaches for over 10 years. Stewards not only defend beaches from the few people determined to breach the rope barriers, but bring their own outreach materials to educate people on the importance of stewardship. They also rescue stranded crabs in tough spots like abandoned bulkheads.

 

The closed beaches allow shorebirds to gorge on eggs unmolested by people: photographers and birders wanting to get one step closer for the perfect picture, compassionate people wanting to overturn crabs left stranded by the tide, or fishermen wanting to cast for the stripers that run in May.  All with good intentions they scatter birds and force them to fly to other less suitable and less accessible beaches losing valuable gained weight in the process.   The closures allow the birds to stay in the best places and eat like kings.  Paradoxically the bird photographers and watchers end up with even better views because the birds adapt to the settled threat. Even fishermen find enough space to fish from the observation areas.

person disturbing shorebirds with dog
This person is unaware that her impact has cleared the area of shorebird leaving all the eggs to laughing gulls, who as we all know fear no human.

 

At the height of the season people could come to one of the five observation areas in the Reeds, Pierce’s Cove and see flocks of nearly 30,000 shorebirds including 14,000 red knots – two thirds of the  whole population in the bay this year (as determined by air and ground counts).  Photographers, birders and inquisitive people had a wonderful experience and the birds got fat.

 

Despite the difficulties caused by the unusually cold spring, most birds of the three species we follow reached good departure weights and by May 26th they started to leave. By June 1st most were gone and by June 2nd we advised reopening the beaches, 5 days earlier than the usual June 7th opening.

weight graphs

 

Our team of scientists, managers, students, volunteers, and stewards deserve praise for all the various projects and research conducted throughout the season, from cannon netting and bird study, resightings of previously banded birds, research on shorebird movement, research on oyster reefs and structural aquaculture, monitoring of horseshoe crabs, monitoring crab egg densities, volunteer efforts to rescue stranded crabs, to steward protected areas and tag crabs. Also, the volunteers of Citizens United to Protect the Maurice River deserve a special thanks for their logistical support for our team, they prepared over 20 dinners for 30 plus people every night of our project.  Birds and Scientists all gain weight in May!

 

They all deserve gratitude, from the birds and horseshoe crabs, the people who love birds and horseshoe crabs and the people who love Delaware Bay.

 

2016 shorebird project team ( without phil's correction)
The 2016 shorebird team

 

Dr. Larry Niles has led efforts to protect red knots and horseshoe crabs for over 30 years.

Leave a Comment

  1. Good to learn that aquaculture is not impacting shorebird recovery even when the horseshoe crab spawn timing is out of synch with the migration. Wonderful news!

  2. “Reply from Dr. Larry Niles – We appreciate the comment from Dr. Bushek but he is too generous. The expansion of aquaculture on Delaware Bay is just underway and the long term destructive impact has yet to be felt. The agencies have laid bare every habitat important to horseshoe crabs on NJ side of Delaware Bay to industrial aquaculture unless the public speaks up and forces them to restrict expansion to the area where it was originally intended, the aquaculture development zone in middle township.”

  3. Thanks for the compliment Larry, but I’m not sure what you are talking about. Federal and state agencies have already restricted commercial aquaculture along the New Jersey portion of the bay in order to protect migratory shorebird and horseshoe crab habitat. Prior to those efforts, oyster aquaculture was permitted along the entire Delaware Bay shore from Egg Island to the Cape Shore Lab. Oyster leases occupy and have occupied much of this habitat for more than a century with many farms using large and extensive rack systems until disease wiped out production in the 1950s. It was and continues to be a very green form of agriculture. Today there are just eight small farms working several leases across ten acres that cover less than 2 miles of the 50 miles used by red knots. Moreover, there are wide expanses between several of these farms. The ADZ you reference was not designed to restrict the location of the activity but to encourage revitalization of an environmentally beneficial food production system to help stimulate and stabilize the economy while benefiting the environment. It was sited in part to avoid shore bird interaction, but also to avoid existing leases, areas without access, areas designated for other purposes and areas that were otherwise not suitable. The current conservation measures that dictate where farms can be located and how they may be used were designed explicitly to protect red knots. Those measures considerably restrict aquaculture growth as well as existing activities, particularly in sensitive areas. Conserve Wildlife, ALS and NJ Audubon along with some other groups and the many individuals that support these organizations have been quite successful in limiting all aquaculture activities in Delaware Bay.

  4. “Reply from Dr. Larry Niles –

    Dr Bushek, thanks for your reply and the occasion to respond.

    I am surprised that you don’t understand my point. The historic leases you refer to were those given to cultivate natural oyster beds. The new permits allow for structural aquaculture – metal racks and other structures on the intertidal shore that require all terrain vehicles to frequently power wash mud worm casings off the caged oysters. Its using the inter tidal shore for an industrial scale activity that produces oyster in great. The fact that there are a small number isn’t meaningful.

    The shift from natural oyster beds to highly mechanize structural oyster aquaculture is a new use of a public resource that should have been done in a cooperative process with public scrutiny. As you know there was no opportunity for either expert shorebird or horseshoe crab biologists to take part in your negotiations or for the public to know the deals being made.

    The agencies made agreements with the structure oyster aquaculture industry that only met minimum assessment of impact: the impact of disturbance on red knots on the beaches. They did not address the impact to birds using the inter tidal flats or to the potential obstruction of horseshoe crabs or impairment in returning to the sea. Its does not deal with impacts to other shorebird species or to the needs of the crabs themselves, who feed on small clams and marine invertebrates while breeding in Delaware Bay.

    The aquaculture industry has forced the use of a public trust resource as though their is no other greater use or ecological need.”

    1. Dr. Niles, some small farmers in this area are weary of hearing about “our” ATVs. Had you ever accepted one of Betsy Haskin’s repeated invitations to tour her “oyster garden”, you would know that some small family farms here have operated for years without ever using or intending to use ATVs.
      We have not a single ATV among the three small family farms that make up the Cape May Oyster Cooperative.
      Your hyperbolic language is ill-assorted with the facts. Please do not slander us. Science, I believe, requires accurate observation.

  5. Larry,

    this will be my final post to this blog entry.

    I don’t understand your point because virtually every statement you make to support it is false. Here is a link to photos showing structural aquaculture dating back to the 1930s:

    http://hsrl.rutgers.edu/HSRL%20documents/Historic%20Cape%20Shore%20Oyster%20Aquaculture.pdf

    there has been no shift in the authorized use of a public resource, only increased restrictions to protect shorebirds, horseshoe crabs and their habitats.

    New regulations outlined in the USFWS PBO fully consider impacts to red knots, horseshoe crabs and their habitat. Your wife Mandy Dey, Senior Zoologist with the DEP ENSP, worked to help write many of the conservation measures. While I attended public meetings where regulators told growers what conditions were being planned and/or would be imposed, I was not involved in any negotiations. The entire process involved DEP’s ENSP and its advisory group (ENSAC) which includes representatives from many conservation groups and solicits input from them as well. To say that you and other conservationists had no opportunity for input is simply false.

    All of the regulatory documents indicate lots of input from conservation groups and cite much of your work.

    Regards,

    Dave

Comments are closed.